Posts Tagged ‘books’

Starship Troopers: Skip The Movie And Read This Book

Wednesday, August 15th, 2007

I have never been able to sit through a showing of Starship Troopers, even though I’m very familiar with the beginning of it. But everyone seems to love this book, so I wanted to find out what its all about. And I have found out that the book is pretty good.

This is a Heinlein book. So that means it could be either kind of good, weird, and well written like Stranger in A Strange Land or really bad like Time Enough For Love. It is definitely more like Stranger in a Stranger Land in the fact that it is enjoyable and succinct. (There is no shocker at the end, unlike SIASL.) :)

Heinlein’s military is probably the main exhibit in this book. He points out some deficiencies in the militaries of the past (which is now), so this must be why Starship Troopers is called “controversial”. One point that Heinlein makes is about how there are so many officers compared to soldiers in militaries of the past (he means now, again). Everyone in Heinlein’s military fights, and those who do not are civilians. Heinlein draws attention to how many of the officers of our era are commissioned without ever being “experienced” soldiers. And another interesting tidbit about Heinlein’s society is this: only those people who have served a term in the military and retired are allowed to vote. The idea is that you make a sacrifice for the honor of having a voice in the government. Another very interesting concept.

Here’s one more thing that I saw. Heinlein has quite an obvious stance on corporal punishment. He’s for it. In this book a public flogging was the punishment for drunk driving. And that sounds like a fitting punishment to me.

And if there is any other controversy in this book, I didn’t catch it. I am, after all, reading for pleasure.

So one thing about this book is that the war involves space-alien hive bugs. Have you ever heard of this plot before? Hmm…Uncle Orson, if you’re out there…would you like to comment on that?

This is a short and easy read, if you like science fiction. And the story is enjoyable, even if it is about war. So I say go for it. Much of what I read isn’t as good as this book.

The Mysteries of Udolpho: A Fabulous Novel

Monday, August 13th, 2007

If only Jane Austen had written more! This what I think at times, and this sentiment is also related to the reason I decided to read this book. It doesn’t disappoint. I haven’t read anything as good in the realm of fiction since my months reading the Jane Austen books.

The Mysteries of Udolpho is the first novel that was considered to be gothic horror. There is not a lot of what we would consider horror in this book. It is very suspenseful, and there are a lot of supposed supernatural occurrences that are all explained by the end of the book. This book (set in France and Italy) is the story of Emily St. Aubert, a 16 year old, who loses her parents (just after you start to like them) at the beginning of the book. She goes to live with her aunt who marries a shady character, Montoni, an Italian mobster with a castle. Emily is confined to the castle by Montoni and is separated from her true love, Valancourt.

The Mysteries of Udolpho was mentioned extensively in Northanger Abbey. And after reading this book, I think that people should actually read the Mysteries of Udolpho before reading Northanger Abbey. If you haven’t read Northanger Abbey, you should know that the main plot in this book centers around the hilarious hijinks that are a result of the heroine reading too many gothic novels and seeing a lot of intrigue and mystery where there is none.

This book is also public domain, since it was written in the 1800′s and the copyright has expired. So you don’t even have to rush out to your library to get it. It is available for download at gutenberg.org. But this book is so good I’m going to buy it.

Thoughts on The Amulet of Samarkand

Sunday, August 5th, 2007

AnA!

I bought this book because it had a fabulous cover, and it was half off the normal price at the Scholastic warehouse.

I started reading it, and I wanted my money back. I felt this way until at least half way through the book. Up until the middle, it was just boring. But the ending was rather good, and there is a lot of potential built up for more of the story (and I think there are indeed sequels). I think that it might even make a good movie. Looking back, it may have just been my own impatience with non-Harry Potter books that spoiled the beginning for me.

One thing I noticed is that the author mentions treacle at least twice in this book to describe something. Maybe treacle is very important to British authors. I really don’t find American authors using “like molasses” a lot or even “like [insert a dessert]” to describe anything.

If you liked The Prestige, then this book may be for you. It is set in a world where magicians are the highest caste in London. This book gets a 3/5 on my personal rating system.

The Great Book Of Amber Comes To An End

Wednesday, August 1st, 2007

I just wanted everyone to know that I have finally reached the end of The Great Book Of Amber. I don’t know if I’ll have as much reason to mention it in so many of my blog posts anymore. The biggest impact it had on my life was that it was long, and it was really hard to carry around in my purse.

I have decided that I did in fact enjoy it, despite all my complaining. Whether it deserves its status among the best fantasy books of all time according to some sketchy internet sites cannot be confirmed or denied by me. But Robert Zelazny definitely has his own style.

So I’m left with reading The Mysteries of Udolpho, Darcy and Elizabeth, and The Amulet of Samarkand. That is only three books!! Time for a trip to the library?

Eragon: The Motion Picture, or Something

Monday, July 23rd, 2007

The first movie we’ve got since we resumed netflix is Eragon, and we have just finished watching it. I haven’t read the book yet so I’m not doing a reader’s critique today.

Overall, I think that the movie went pretty quickly, and it had a lot of nice landscapes. I had to ask a lot of questions, and I think Andy had to rely on his book knowledge to answer my questions. Is this how people feel who watch the Harry Potter movies without seeing the book?

I am really quite pleased that I didn’t read the book, though. I’m not sure I would have dealt with the obvious omission of parts that well. The dragon rider thing was quite a neat idea that I haven’t come across in the fantasy world. Maybe I just don’t get out much (or I get out too much?).

Summary: It was a pretty movie that had a plot with some potential, and I’ll probably read the book, whenever I’m guaranteed that there is an ending to the saga.

——————————–

Dragons, swords, and Avril Lavigne. One of these things is not like the others.

Plotty, It’s a Real Word

Friday, July 6th, 2007

So whenever I contemplated The Great Book Of Amber I was always searching for a word to describe it. And finally, this evening, I thought of a word. That word is “plotty”. Actually, I thought I had made it up, but I looked it up. It’s in the dictionary, and it means exactly what I thought it should.

dictionary.com’s definition of this adjective: characterized by the intricacies or complications of a plot or intrigue

I am only on the 7th book (out of 10 of The Great Book of Amber) for those following along. And I find it very plotty. Up until the 6th book Corwin would have to talk to each of his brothers and sisters whenever he showed up in Amber and piece together clues from rather long winded conversations. Now Merlin does the same thing. I think this new term can also be used to describe The Wheel of Time saga, which had lots of stuff happen in 600+ pages, but not a lot of progress made (at least in the later books).

I’m really looking forward to using this new word. It’s been missing from my vocabulary for a long time.

Reading The Time Machine And Taking A Break Because It’s Scary

Friday, June 29th, 2007

People have said I should read it and now I have. The Time Machine is very old science fiction / fantasy, and even though it is a classic it is very readable and even quite suspenseful. It is really a very simple story (just one story line), which is really refreshing. And it’s a quick read. Like many other books of this era, the main character, who is a sort of snooty scientific fellow invites all his snooty scientific friends over to discuss physics and time travel. The second time the snooty science friends meet, the main character tells the story of his journey to the future where he discovers the Morlocks and the Eloi. The Morlocks and Eloi are both descended from humans, but the Eloi are more like cows and the Morlocks are more like Eloitarians. And the Morlocks are slimy (figuratively) and could be the foreunners of the Tlulaxa (in my imagination anyway).

I think the main character went about 108,000 years into the future. It’s too bad he didn’t stop in the 24th century to meet Jean Luc Picard because this guy needs to know about the prime directive. He created some really serious havoc to get his time machine back. Those slimy Morlocks took it. :)

Three Stars on Darcy’s Sci Fi / Fantasy rating scale, which is quite respectable.

Dude, That Was Messed Up!

Wednesday, June 27th, 2007

So tonight after Adam and Amber stopped by …

AnA!

I finished reading A Scanner Darkly. This book is quite interesting. I don’t know what genre of science fiction it is from but it has a cyberpunk-like quality except that it is actually entertaining. Everyone takes drugs knowing fully that they will fry their brains and some are undercover police officers who are drug addicts as well but on the side of good. There are plans within plans. I’d tell you what the title means but it is deep and it requires an explanation that is longer than I’m willing to type tonight. Here is what Philip K. Dick says about the novel at the end:

“There is no moral in this novel; it is not bourgeois; it does not say they were wrong to play when they should have toiled; it just tells what the consequences were. ”

And the ending notes by the author indicate that it is very autobiographical. That’s even more messed up.

So on my science fiction rating scale of personal enjoyment and likeliness to reread, this book gets 3 stars. This is a quality book. I probably won’t read it again, but there is really nothing wrong with it. It’s interesting, it grabs you, and its really not even about a topic I would normally enjoy. (Minus one because its not something I would normally enjoy and minus one because I probably won’t re-read). I feel a little guilty that such a good book has gotten such a low rating on my personal scale, but oh well. 3 stars are what I have rated A Storm Of Swords and The Crystal Cave (both good). But 3 stars are also the rating I have given A Fire Upon The Deep (not that great, although well written + original). Maybe I should rethink these ratings.

But I would be interested enough to see the movie, which is very artistic looking as well. I know this because I saw Andy watching a lot of it…I wasn’t really paying attention though. I think Keanu Reeves is in this movie, and for some reason when I think of him I feel the urge to say “Dude!!”. So there it is.

My Day Off

Thursday, December 21st, 2006

Today was my day off. I was out shopping for nearly all of my Christmas gifts this morning starting at 9. After three exhausting hours, I was done. Then I came home and wrapped them. Or to be more accurate, I stuff most of the presents in bags with tissue paper. While I was doing that I watched all the Friends, Sex and the City, and Arrested Development episodes that Tivo had recorded. I eventually ran out and had to watch a movie.

I went through my books and picked out the worst ones I have and I’m going to add them to bookmooch. I’m willing to give these away to anyone here who wants them as well, but FYI I didn’t like any of them.

Janet Evanovich: One For The Money

Jim Crace: Being Dead

C. J. Cherryh: The Faded Sun Trilogy

Norman Mailer: Ancient Evenings

Eoin Colfer: Artemis Fowl

Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins: Left Behind and Tribulation Force.